Welcome to visit
Replacing an anilox roller on a CI flexo press is not simply a matter of copying the old roller’s dimensions, LPI and volume. A replacement can match the engraved specifications and still behave differently on press if the mechanical fit, effective ink volume, cell geometry or high-speed running accuracy are not equivalent.
For CI flexo printers, the goal is not only to make a roller that fits the machine. The new roller should also match the press conditions and the print result the customer is trying to achieve.
Before discussing LPI or BCM, confirm that the new roller can be installed and run correctly on the existing press.
Important dimensions may include:
Overall length
Engraved face length
Outside diameter
Journal diameters
Bearing-seat dimensions
Shoulder positions
Drive-side details
Keyways or other mounting features
For an anilox sleeve, the sleeve inside diameter, face length and compatibility with the existing air mandrel also need to be checked.
This is especially important on older CI flexo presses. Original drawings may be missing, and shafts, bearings or drive components may have been repaired or modified over time. In these cases, copying only a few basic dimensions can create avoidable installation problems.
A common situation is that a new roller is manufactured according to the LPI and nominal volume marked on the old roller, but the print density changes after installation. White may print stronger, or a solid color may become darker.
This does not automatically mean the new roller is wrong.
The old roller may no longer have the same effective cell volume it had when it was new. Dried ink, coating residue, cell wear or local damage can reduce the amount of ink the roller actually carries and releases. The number engraved on the roller body may still show the original BCM or cm³/m², while the working ink-transfer performance has changed.
A new roller made to the original specification can restore the nominal cell volume and ink-transfer potential. Its print result may therefore differ from a worn or partially blocked roller.
So before replacement, one question should be answered:
Should the new roller reproduce the original specification, or should the engraving be adjusted to achieve the current target print density?
If the current roller has always produced stable results and the printing application has not changed, reproducing the original specification is usually the safest choice.
But if the press has been struggling with poor white opacity, weak solid density, unstable color at higher speeds or frequent viscosity adjustments, it may be worth reviewing the engraving instead of copying it automatically.
The press may now run faster, use a different ink system or handle a different mix of flexible-packaging jobs. White ink, heavy solids, fine screens and process work do not require the same ink-transfer characteristics.
The objective is not to change the specification without reason. It is to confirm that the replacement still matches the work being produced today.
On a CI flexo press, correct dimensions are only part of the mechanical requirement.
Total indicated runout, concentricity and dynamic balance also matter, especially as press speed increases.
Excessive runout can affect contact consistency between the anilox surface and doctor blade, contributing to unstable metering, blade chatter or uneven wear. Poor balance, on the other hand, can create vibration at production speed even if the roller appears acceptable at low speed.
Runout and dynamic balance should therefore be treated as separate parts of the replacement specification. Required tolerances should be confirmed according to roller construction, weight, working speed and press requirements rather than relying on one generic number for every application.
Two rollers can have the same nominal LPI and BCM and still behave differently in production.
Cell geometry, the opening-to-depth relationship, engraving quality and cell-wall condition can influence how the cells fill and release ink.
This becomes more important in demanding applications such as white ink, high-density solids or fine process printing.
For replacement projects, the supplier should understand both the engraved specification and the job the roller is expected to perform. Matching the nameplate is not always the same as matching the print requirement.
This is common on older CI flexo presses. The original roller drawing may have been lost while the press is still in daily production.
A replacement can still be evaluated using the existing roller and machine information.
Useful information includes:
Press brand and model
Photos of the existing roller
Nameplate or engraved markings
Overall length and face length
Outside diameter
Journal and bearing-seat dimensions
Existing LPI and volume
Ink type
Main printing application
If a complete drawing is unavailable, photos and measured dimensions are often enough to begin the evaluation. Critical mechanical details can then be confirmed before manufacturing.
A replacement anilox roller for a CI flexo press should not be specified as simply:
same size + same LPI + same BCM.
A reliable replacement should consider the complete system: mechanical fit, runout, balance, engraving condition, ink-transfer requirement and actual printing application.
If the old roller has performed well, reproducing the original specification may be the right solution. If the press has been experiencing density, white-ink or ink-transfer problems, copying the old specification without review may also reproduce the same limitation.
If the original drawing is available, send it together with the current LPI and volume. If the drawing is missing, the press model, roller photos, nameplate information and key dimensions are enough to begin a technical review.
The objective before production is simple: make sure the new roller fits the press mechanically and delivers the ink-transfer performance required for the current job.